Marianne could trust. She trusted her instincts; she trusted those dear to her; she trusted her emotions and her passions. She drank deep, you could see that; she squeezed every drop of living out of all the elements that mattered to her. It made her careless sometimes, of course it did, but it was a wonderfully rich and rapt way to be.
And I, Elinor, said silently to herself, am not rich or rapt in the very slightest.
(from Joanna Trollope’s Sense & Sensibility)
Joanna Trollope’s Sense & Sensibility is the first book to be released as part of The Austen Project, in which well-known authors have been recruited to put a modern-day spin on the novels of Jane Austen. I have mixed feelings about this project. Austen-inspired novels are my guilty pleasure, and I love how Austen’s stories and characters are timeless. However, I’m not too keen on the use of Austen’s original titles; those are hers and hers alone, and there’s no reason why these modern updates can’t have their own, original titles. Still, I couldn’t wait to see what these authors would come up with, and so I eagerly delved into Trollope’s rendition of Sense and Sensibility.
Trollope closely follows the original plot: Henry Dashwood dies, and Norland Park is left to his son from a previous marriage. John Dashwood’s insufferable wife, Fanny, convinces him that his “stepmother,” Belle (who wasn’t officially married to his father in this version), and his half-sisters, Elinor, Marianne, and Margaret must move out and that they will be fine on what little money his father left them. The women take up residence in a faraway cottage belonging to a distant cousin, dependent on the kindness of Sir John Middleton and his gossipy mother-in-law, Mrs. Jennings. Elinor, the sensible Dashwood girl, is the only one to recognize that they need an income, and despite her desire to finish architectural school, she finds a job, while her flighty artist mother and melodramatic musician sister, Marianne, spend much of their time whining about their circumstances and pining for home.
Of course, there are romantic entanglements; Elinor has bonded with Fanny’s brother, Ed Ferrars, who is overwhelmed by family obligations to marry well and choose a respectable career, while Marianne falls hopelessly and desperately in love with John “Wills” Willoughby, who sweeps her off her feet (literally and figuratively), and dismisses the kindhearted, generous Colonel Bill Brandon because she finds him old and boring. When their relationships fall apart, it becomes clear that one has too much sense and the other too much sensibility, and what they both need is a happy medium.
Trollope’s Sense & Sensibility is a quick read, but I missed Austen’s rich characterizations, which perfectly balance the seriousness of characters like Elinor and Colonel Brandon with the exuberance of Sir John (“Jonno” here) and the ridiculousness of Mrs. Jennings and her daughter, Charlotte Palmer, to name a few. Trollope’s characters are all a little too much, to the point where they become more annoying than humorous. The stiff dialogue and long-winded sentences, especially at the beginning, made it hard for me to connect with the characters at first, though Trollope does a good job showing how trying it can be to put up with crazy relatives.
There were a few touches that I enjoyed, particularly Bill Brandon’s use of Delaford as a rehabilitation home for drug addicts, but I wish the book felt more modern. There were plenty of mentions of fast cars, iPods, texting, and even humiliating YouTube videos, but they didn’t always work when placed alongside more outdated beliefs. Lucy Steele was still hunting for a man with money, Belle and Marianne had no problem mooching off Jonno and Mrs. J instead of finding jobs, and even Elinor’s argument that happiness shouldn’t depend on a man doesn’t hold up when she spends the entire novel pining for Ed.
I hope it doesn’t sound like I didn’t enjoy Trollope’s Sense & Sensibility because I did. Her portrayal of Margaret as a sullen 13-year-old who lost her father and was torn away from her friends when the family relocated was spot on, and Colonel Brandon was a more attractive hero in this version — so much so that I actually was rooting for him and Elinor to fall in love at one point. His relationship with Marianne was much more realistic in Trollope’s version, as I’ve always wondered about how quickly Marianne attaches herself to him in the original novel. Trollope’s Sense & Sensibility was fast-paced and fun overall, and I appreciate that Trollope strove to stay true to Austen. I just wonder if Sense and Sensibility might simply be more difficult to adapt to the present day, though I haven’t read any other modern-day re-tellings for comparison. (If you have, I’d love to hear your thoughts!)
Thanks to TLC Book Tours for having me on Trollope’s Sense & Sensibility tour. To follow the tour, click here.
Disclosure: I received Sense & Sensibility from Harper for review.
© 2013 Anna Horner of Diary of an Eccentric. All Rights Reserved. Please do not reproduce or republish content without permission.
Yes yes yes, what you said! :–)
LikeLike
I’m glad I’m not alone! This was such a hard review to write because I’m so torn over it.
LikeLike
I’m finishing this one up today. Thanks for the honest review.
LikeLike
I can’t wait to talk about it more in depth with you!
LikeLike
I’m with you on the title – I would think using the same title would confuse readers.
LikeLike
I agree, too, that it will confuse readers, but I also think it sort of disrespects Austen, like it’s hinting that a new S&S, etc., is needed.
LikeLike
I’ve been wary about this project as well. I love the idea in theory. The titles should have been changed, I totally agree.
LikeLike
I’m still looking forward to reading the others.
LikeLike
I’m wary of these new books. I didn’t enjoy the modern language from snippets I’d heard in an interview with Trollope. I also agree I don’t like how they’ve used the originals titles.
LikeLike
I’ve read some really great modern-day re-tellings that keep the basic points of the plot intact and then make it their own, and they work simply because Austen’s characters and stories really are timeless. I just wanted to be “wowed” by this one because it’s part of a pretty big project; it just was too close to the original to stand out on its own.
LikeLike
The library has it, yay
LikeLike
I can’t wait to see what you think!
LikeLike
I’m all for Austen spin-offs, and this one sounds good, but I don’t like the use of Austen’s original titles either. Those are hers alone.
LikeLike
I am disappointed with that choice, but the true fans will know the difference!
LikeLike
I agree about the title. I like Austen spin-offs but they don’t all work for me. Great review, as usual!
LikeLike
Thanks, Laura!
LikeLike
[…] Wednesday, October 30th: Diary of an Eccentric […]
LikeLike
What a fun idea for a book! Thanks for being on the tour Anna.
LikeLike
Thanks, Heather!
LikeLike
I saw this in the bookstore today and was tempted, but in the end, I just couldn’t buy it. I was put off by the title- because it made me think the whole thing would be as unimaginative a rip-off. It would be a tall order to modernize Austen, since so much of the plotting depends on customs of the time, and yet there are things about Austen that are timeless or we wouldn’t love her books so much today. Part of me wants to read this to see how effective a modernized version might be, but the other part of me thinks it might be better just to re-read the original. I haven’t decided yet which side to listen to. Thanks for this review!
LikeLike
I have read a number of wonderful modernized versions of other Austen novels, but not S&S. It seems like a hard one to update, but I’m willing to give another one a try in the future. I hope you’re not put off by all of them…there are some real gems out there!
LikeLike
I don’t like that they are using the same titles either.
LikeLike
Sigh.
LikeLike
[…] (Under the Wide and Starry Sky)32. Anna @ Diary of an Eccentric (The Importance of Being Emma)33. Anna @ Diary of an Eccentric (Joanna Trollope’s Sense & Sensibility)34. Terry Delaney (Christmas Notes)35. Carol -A Literary Journey36. Becky (The String Quartet)37. […]
LikeLike
“I just wonder if Sense and Sensibility might simply be more difficult to adapt to the present day,”
“Trollope’s characters are all a little too much, to the point where they become more annoying than humorous.”
I felt this way exactly…I’m always torn when writing a review of a book that I can’t be positive about. I’ve never read the original, so I couldn’t compare the plot or characters to Austen’s, but from Trollope’s version, I couldn’t make myself like a single one. I wanted to like Elinor and I tried. But, I just couldn’t. Whining, whining, and more whining was all I heard :(:(
I will still try to read the original over the holidays, but I’m not sure these re-tellings work for the 21st century.
LikeLike
I love the original novel, so I think it make it easier for me to tolerate the characters, even though I wasn’t fond of them. I have read some really great modern-day retellings, so I think it was just this one that didn’t work for me. But I still didn’t completely dislike it.
LikeLike
I’ve read a few reviews of this book but yours is the first to talk about The Austen Project. I agree with you about the titles…if a modern day renditions of Austen’s novels are being written, they should be given a new title that coincides with the new-ish story.
Sense and Sensibility has always been my favorite (if I have to choose one!) of Austen’s novels. I’m not sure, then, how much I’d like this modern day version which doesn’t sound modern exactly. But the book sounds entertaining and I’m interested in how Joanna Trollope deals with the characters.
I think you review is great…sincere, fair and a good description of Trollope’s attempt to write her version. Thanks, Anna!
LikeLike
Thanks, Amy! I want to read another updated S&S so I can compare the two.
LikeLike
[…] | Diary of an Eccentric | A Spoonful of Happy […]
LikeLike